<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Reviews @ FredMiranda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shutter.box.com.ph/2006-10-30-canon-ef-70-200mm-f4l-is-usm-reviews-fredmiranda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shutter.box.com.ph/2006-10-30-canon-ef-70-200mm-f4l-is-usm-reviews-fredmiranda/</link>
	<description>All Philippine Photography Info in One Box!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sherwin</title>
		<link>http://shutter.box.com.ph/2006-10-30-canon-ef-70-200mm-f4l-is-usm-reviews-fredmiranda/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>sherwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 06:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shutter.box.com.ph/2006-10-30-canon-ef-70-200mm-f4l-is-usm-reviews-fredmiranda/#comment-580</guid>
		<description>wow 4 stops of IS, this is way too yummy! gotta save up on 70-200 2.8 though :) but if the IS will compensate for the f/4 opening, this will be a great lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow 4 stops of IS, this is way too yummy! gotta save up on 70-200 2.8 though <img src='http://shutter.box.com.ph/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> but if the IS will compensate for the f/4 opening, this will be a great lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
